file1701261140831Have you completed your holiday travels for the year? Were they as smooth and predictable as you hoped? The following year might be an interesting one for Minnesota air travel, and not necessarily for reasons relating to the weather. Most people prefer to handle airport security details as quickly as possible and then be en route to their destinations. Next year could conceivably be more complicated, however, in the event that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) decides a driver’s license is no longer enough for airline passengers to clear security in some states, most notably Minnesota.  In these states, drivers licenses have not complied with federal standards as established by the Real ID Act (enacted in 2005).  Basically, the standards of the Act require more stringent proof of identity than currently on a standard Minnesota driver’s license, so as to eventually allow users’ information to be shared in a national database.    Not everyone is on board with the DHS plan, however.  Privacy experts, civil liberty organizations and libertarian groups fear the law would create something like a national identification card.  According to the map shown, travelers can circumnavigate Minnesota’s noncompliance with an “enhanced” driver’s license.  This is no doubt why thousands of Minnesotans have recently applied for such an enhanced license.  The Department of Motor Vehicles can tell you about getting such a license. You can also check out this DHS page to read more about the Real ID Act and where travelers stand on using their drivers license for airport security.

The timing of this coincides with a recent Transportation Safety Authority (TSA) policy mandating electronic screening for “some” passengers, who were previously allowed to opt out of the scanner with a standard pat-down.  According to the TSA, the scanner technology offers superior “threat detection capabilities for both metallic and nonmetallic threat objects.” In other words, the scanners can catch weapons hidden in clothes that a pat-down might miss.  This predictably raises questions, such as why are they not simply mandating the scan for everyone? And which passengers are the “some” which will still no longer get to opt for the pat-down as opposed to submit to the scanner?

The law of airport security and its constitutional implications may not come up every day, but a couple of law review articles touch on this touchy subject. Check out The Post-TSA Airport: A Constitution Free Zone? recently published in the Pepperdine Law Review.  Also see Enhancing Security while Protecting Privacy: The Rights Implicated by Supposedly Heightened Airport Security from the Michigan State Law Review.

 

Human Trafficking in the News

Linda Miller

Civil Society Founder and Executive Director Linda Miller

Human trafficking is an issue  that never goes away. This sort of crime often involves the most young and vulnerable victims, with perpetrators who are often established middle-aged men. Trafficking often takes place quietly over the internet in the heart of our own local communities. The problem becomes even harder to fight when it involves practices that are shrouded and protected by social or cultural norms.

The cultural complication is central in a case at the U.S. District Court of Minnesota, which recently made national news. In the case of Panyia Vang v. Thiawachu Prataya et al, the plaintiff is seeking statutory damages under “Masha’s Law” (18 U.S.C. 2255).  Basically, Masha’s law is federal civil legislation offering victims the chance for monetary relief in cases such as child pornography, child sex tourism, and child sex trafficking.  Vang’s attorney, Linda Miller, believes this is the first case to use Masha’s Law to recover monetary damages from child sex tourism.  Read the tragic and shocking story that appeared in a recent issue of the Star Tribune describing what happened to Panyia Vang as a fourteen-year-old that ultimately led to Miller filing this case in 2011.  Combating this kind of abuse is the professional mission of Miller (pictured here), who is the founder and executive director of the local organization Civil Society.

If you think someone is a victim of human trafficking, call the National Human Trafficking Resource Center at (888) 373-7888.  Do you represent victims of human trafficking in your regular or pro bono legal practice?  Consider checking out our copy of Representing Survivors of Human Trafficking (ILRC 2nd) by I. Lee and L. Parker.

 

Conceal and Carry

OLYMPUS DIGITAL CAMERAThe controversial subject of personal handgun conceal and carry has been rather prominent this summer in Minnesota. Besides a recent local incident that put the matter in the news, Minnesota now has reciprocity with North Dakota in recognizing registered carriers. An article from last Sunday’s Star Tribune reports that 200,000 Minnesotans now have permits to carry handguns. Controversies remain, with both sides having plenty of data to back up their arguments.

Carrying a gun is not for everyone, and an untrained and unprepared person toting a gun is no benefit to anyone.  Perhaps you have given it careful thought, however, and decided that carrying a handgun is right for you. If so, familiarize yourself with MN Stat §624.714.  Know the protocol you will need to follow if you get your permit.  Be aware that you will have to pass a background check, and that certain prior charges or convictions make you ineligible. You will also be required to take four to six hours of training in handgun safety. A permit usually costs $100, and must be renewed every five years. More information regarding the application process and your eligibility is available through the Minnesota Department of Public Safety.  To apply for your permit, simply file this application with your local sheriff’s department.  If the department denies your application, you may choose file a Petition for Reconsideration through District Court.

For more a more detailed and scholarly look at the history of Minnesota firearm carry laws, see this informative guide compiled by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library.

 

Legislating Biology?

DSC06157As warm weather settles in, people are predictably taking walks, riding bikes, and enjoying other outdoor public activities. Of course, nature will eventually call on people as they enjoy her summer gifts. So this blog entry is about public restrooms. Not about the correct number of women’s facilities to men’s, or about where baby changing tables should be located, or about which restroom a transgender person should use, but about the simple availability of public restrooms.

In short, public restrooms seem to be in short supply in the places and times they are needed, especially if they are locked during certain time spans. This can leave people with few or no options when they desperately need to use them. The Minnesota Legislature sort of recognized this problem when it passed the Restroom Access Act, which essentially requires retail establishments to allow customers access to employee restrooms provided they have an “eligible medical condition.” This doesn’t help the medically ineligible, plus it holds businesses responsible for meeting a basic human need. (Restaurants provide restrooms for customers, of course, but you might not need it until 30 minutes AFTER you ate their blistering curry.)

If you are out walking your dog, Fido might conveniently opt to relieve himself on the spot (backed up by your baggie please), but don’t be tempted to follow suit. In Minnesota, one who relieves oneself publicly can be charged under the state indecent exposure statute (MN Stat.§617.23). St. Paul also has a municipal ordinance against public urination. No numbers are available as to how many people are so charged under these laws, but it would be interesting to see if there is any relationship between the proximity of public restrooms and the cases that were fully charged.

Perhaps there is a relationship between limited public restroom availability and possible Fourth Amendment implications. The old Katz vs. US 389 US 347 (1967) case was about the expectation of privacy in an enclosed phone booth with a door. (…Public phone stations then evolved to be doorless.)  In State v. Bryant 177 N.W.2d 800 (1970), the Minnesota Supreme Court extended Katz and held that this expectation of privacy extends to public restrooms, so perhaps there is concern that public restrooms encourage criminal activity by creating constitutionally-protected privacy zones.   There is also the concern that public restrooms may encourage the congregation of homeless and transient people, with Denver being a good example of one municipality’s struggle with this real-life problem.  But the leaders there discovered that when they opted out of public restrooms and all of their perceived problems (including drug use and prostitution), they were faced with a new problem in that areas without restrooms predictably got turned into restrooms.

Concerned citizens wishing to see more public restrooms may simply have to pressure their own local leaders, but also be aware of the mission and activities of the American Restroom Association.

 

National Library Week (and What It’s All About)

March 11 2015 004This week the Ramsey County Law Library joins with libraries all across the nation in celebrating National Library Week. A brainchild of the American Library Association (ALA), the purpose of this event is to celebrate the contributions of our nation’s libraries and librarians and to promote library use and support. After all, as the ALA’s Freedom to Read Statement begins, “[t]he freedom to read is essential to our democracy.” Our library is also committed to the principles set forth in the ALA’s Library Bill of Rights.

Our particular library serves the Second Judicial District Court, city and county officials, members of the local bar, and inhabitants of Ramsey County. It is covered under Minnesota Statute §134A, which governs the establishment and operations of county law libraries in Minnesota.  In particular, §134A.02 requires that “the use of the library shall be free to the judges of the state, state officials, judges of the district, municipal, county, and conciliation courts of the county, city and county officials, members of the bar, and inhabitants of the county.” (This contrasts to county law libraries in some other states, where access might be by paid subscription or only for local attorneys.) So when people ask if our library is open to the public, the answer is an unequivocal “yes.”

Best-selling author David Baldacci is serving as Honorary Chair of National Library Week. Visitors to the library this week can register to win one of three Balducci political thriller novels, plus pick up a free pocket Constitution or a word game.

 

Legislative Focus on the Family

Family law is having its day in the current session of the Minnesota Legislature. To start, a bill that would have drastically changed divorce proceedings by allowing couples to end marriages outside the court captured headlines earlier this month, but appears to have stagnated. Not so some other family-oriented proposed laws currently being considered at the capital. According to an interesting article the March 16 issue of Minnesota Lawyer, a group called the Child Custody Dialogue Group  has met regularly  since 2012 in the hopes of forging consensus on a whole host of family law reforms.  If enacted, these proposed reforms would mark the most significant overhaul to family law in Minnesota decades.

Here are some of the bills that came from the efforts of the Child Custody Dialogue Group:  Specifically, under SF1191/HF465, the 13 current “best interests of the child” factors in child custody proceedings would be scrapped in favor of 12 new factors.  Topping the new list would be “a child’s physical, emotional, cultural, spiritual, and other needs.” (To contrast, the 13 custody factors currently in use under MN Stat §518.17 begin with “the wishes of the child’s parent or parents as to custody.”)  Also of note, SF1103/ HF518 would require courts to award compensatory parenting time, and in some cases civil penalties, when parenting time is denied intentionally and repeatedly, unless the denial was necessary to protect the child’s physical or emotional health.  Additionally, HF464/SF1424 provides for simple market rate-based annual interest rate calculations, for family law judgments. It would also for a lower rate or no interest (although not for child support or spousal maintenance judgments) if the parties agree or the court finds it necessary to avoid unfair hardship, plus move the notice of rights language from “Appendix A” into the actual order for divorce, custody, and parenting time.

March 17 2015 002Of course, time waits for no child.  If you are a parent or practitioner hoping to craft the right parenting agreement for your situation, you know the legislature won’t do it for you.  Come into the library to consult the tools we have for researching and drafting custody agreements.  Some of them include:

  • Building a Parenting Agreement that Works: Child Custody Agreements Step by Step (Nolo 8th Ed. 2014)
  • Child Custody and Visitation Law & Practice (LexisNexis 2011)
  • Minnesota Child Custody Deskbook (MN CLE 2nd Ed. 2011)
 

Indigent Defense

Courtroom 066The Pioneer Press recently featured the work of First Judicial District public defender Lauri Traub in defending Brian Fitch Sr.  Mr. Fitch was convicted earlier this month of first degree murder in the death of police officer Scott Patrick.  He was not a generally popular client, but Traub made clear that her team’s vigorous defense of Fitch was consistent with her belief that “everyone is entitled to representation.”  Fitch was asked by the judge if he had been satisfied with the representation Traub provided, to which he replied “[f]or sure.”

Our modern public defender system is the child of the U.S. Supreme Court decision in the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, which held that indigent criminal defendants have a right to legal counsel under the Sixth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. In State v. Ferris, the Minnesota Supreme Court held that a public defender must be appointed if a defendant would experience “substantial hardship” to hire counsel. Minnesota Statute §611.17 requires courts to consider certain factors in determining a defendant’s eligibility for a public defender.  But Rule 5.04 (Minn. R. Crim. P.) states that “[t]he court must not appoint a district public defender if the defendant is financially able to retain private counsel but refuses to do so.” Further, the Minnesota Court of Appeals clarified in the case of State v. Nace that the right to a public defender does not mean the right to one’s choice of such.  For quick reference, the Minnesota House Research Department published a short synopsis of Minnesota’s Public Defender System, explaining who is eligible for this service.

As last weekend’s television debut of fictional lawyer “Jimmy McGill” dramatized, lawyers don’t typically earn much money from public defense cases. (Traub herself waits tables on the side.) At the same time, public defense is a limited and high-demand resource that gets spread painfully thin, perhaps unconstitutionally so. To consider this proposition, see this 2010 evaluation by the Minnesota State Auditor of the state’s public defender system. Here in the law library we also have Chasing Gideon: The Elusive Quest for Poor People’s Justice by Karen Houppert (The New Press 2013).  This book articulately explains why our nationwide system of public defense is in disarray, and asserts that we still haven’t come close to meeting the promise of Gideon.

 

My Way is the Skyway

This skyway sign above 5th Street has since been removed.

This skyway sign above 5th Street has since been removed.

The St. Paul skyway system has generated its own discussion among the downtown community in the last year, particularly after last year’s arrest incident. Debate over what human behavior was acceptable in the skyway system, versus when law enforcement efforts were going too far was predictable. The role of the skyway has generated even more attention lately, what with plummeting temperatures and the new stair access connecting the Metro Green Line Central Station to the skyway. Also noteworthy: The city is facing a lawsuit from last year’s skyway arrest.

Controversy surrounding the regulation of activity in the skyway is nothing new. Back in the early 1990s, the issues of skyway safety and police presence were frequently in the news. Reports of criminal incidents were frequent, as were charges of race-biased policing. Clearly those were stormy times for the skyway system, yet it also played a key role in downtown St. Paul’s preservation, and perhaps its recent renaissance. The now-active St. Paul Athletic Club once faced demolition, but its skyway role likely saved it from the wrecking ball. At one time the project of connecting the historic Union Depot to the skyway system by way of TPT was feared to be a “skyway to nowhere”– hard to imagine now that the Depot is an active and vital transportation hub.

As a publicly owned amenity, the St. Paul skyway is governed by St. Paul Ordinance 140. Some of the prohibited listed acts include (but are not limited to) littering, sitting on floors or steps, and playing audible music. Citizens can keep abreast of St. Paul skyway issues and express their opinions through the Skyway Governance Advisory Committee of the Capitol River Council. This is an advisory body to the City of Saint Paul and the City Council on issues and policies of the downtown Saint Paul skyway system “including but not limited to its design, signage, and hours of operation, in an effort to uphold the skyway system’s purpose to enable safe pedestrian traffic while also contributing to the economic viability and aesthetic and cultural enrichment of the city as a focus of activity in the downtown area.” Meetings are free and open to the public.

 

Sun Setting on the West

December 5, 2014(2) 001Now that the County plans to raze the buildings that housed the former West Publishing Company, it is time to look back at this local chapter in the history of legal research.  It’s easy to forget that many of the tools used by lawyers and librarians were developed right here in downtown St. Paul.

The instigator of all this was John Briggs West, a relatively uneducated man.  John came to Minnesota from Massachusetts in 1870 when his father, a bookkeeper, was transferred per his employment with the railroad.  Eighteen-year-old John soon found work for himself with a book company, which had him peddling books and office supplies to local lawyers.  These frontier lawyers (hoping to practice something better than frontier justice) complained to John about the difficulty in getting current legal information and other practical tools.  Seeing an opportunity, John quit his job and opened his own downtown St. Paul business in 1872, dedicated to serving the needs of the local bar.  His creations included a line of legal forms, reprints of hard-to-find treatises, and an index to the Minnesota statutes.  With his brother Horatio as his business partner, he soon began publishing a weekly report of the opinions handed down by the Minnesota Supreme Court.  This report was a huge hit, soon to be named the North Western Reporter.  Ten years later, John came up with a bold and original index scheme to catalog cases by subject matter that would later become the well-known key number system.  John left his company in 1899 and was largely forgotten thereafter.  Librarians will be interested to know that John spoke at the 1908 annual meeting of the American Association of Law Libraries (AALL).  He died in 1922 in Pasadena, CA.  The details of John Briggs West and his life are detailed in this article (whose author graciously allowed it to be referenced and linked for this blog).

See this other excellent article which illuminates little known facts of the past West Publishing Company itself.  Many don’t realize, for instance, that the company was responsible for Black’s Law Dictionary.  Also see the included appendix/brochure Law Books by the Million (West 1901) that detailed the day-to-day inner workings of the company at the turn of the previous century. Consider the fact that 5000-6000 sheep skins became the covers for the West Reporting System every month.  Take a minute to see the historic photos, for they speak volumes. (Proofreading at West was probably the epitome of employment opportunities for sharp young women back then.)  The best photos are of the buildings in their heyday, which locals can easily recognize.

One of the buildings marked for destruction became the site of the Ramsey County Jail after the company’s exodus up until 2003. Another was briefly home to the Ramsey County Law Library. It’s worth taking a walking tour of this part of downtown St. Paul to see these buildings while they still stand.   Waiting to see them on Lost Twin Cities 7 is not guaranteed, and won’t be quite the same as seeing them in person.

 

The Right Treatment for Sex Offenders

file5131239156112 Nothing makes for less festive holiday conversation than sex offender treatment options.  It’s just too easy to vilify and stigmatize those who might need such treatments as mere monsters, rather than seeing them as our fellow citizens who are in need of help.  The pedophile priest scandal that has rocked our nation and touched our community demonstrates the large-scale damage that can result from systematic denial and institutionalized ignorance of those with inappropriate or deviant sexual predilections.  It also shows why we should be aware of (if not sympathetic to) those that might need appropriate intervention for their conditions before their actions make news headlines.

Sex offender treatment was a hot subject in our area last week.  The first newsworthy event was the release of the expert report evaluating the Minnesota Sex Offender Program (MSOP), as ordered by U.S. District Court Judge Frank Donovan earlier this year.  As observed in our previous blog, the MSOP came under federal fire for essentially incarcerating people in the guise of civil commitment and “treatment.”  What has made MSOP so controversial is that it operates largely on a civil process and it’s where people might wind up at the end of serving a criminal sentence.  A person does not get admitted via the tidy process of criminal conviction (with its more formalized Constitutional protections).  Its “clients” reportedly receive little in the way of actual treatment, and have virtually no chance of being released from the program. Thus, the expert report calls for changes to the program.  (***The report that the committee released last week is available for reading here at the library.***)

Similarly, it was announced this week that Ramsey County was withdrawing its funding to ABC, a local mental health project that has provided treatment for adult sex offenders with mental disabilities.  Programs like ABC are not to be confused with MSOP, because they are usually day treatment programs and not civil commitments.  Without their contract with the county, ABC has now shut its doors.  Ramsey County announced its plan to steer its future treatment options toward a more “individualized” and “evidence-based” direction. (ABC operated on group therapy models.)   Yet others say that ABC’s closure would be a special loss for the Ramsey County community, given that ABC catered primarily to mentally ill adults.